*

Henry II, that is alleged to have said this shortly before the killing of thomas Becket, have to have had actually a “resistance” faction in his court lot like the in the trumped administration. Ordinarily an effective leaders don’t need to be explicit around what they desire to happen; most of their staff spends many of that is time make the efforts to number out what the boss wants and doing it without gift told. Giving the boss credible deniability has long been grounds for promotion. This is true in corporations, charities, and governments.

You are watching: Who will rid me of this tiresome priest

But lot of the ranking of the US federal government is left end from prior managements and wants to do the specific opposite the what the boss wants and also would like to implicate him, not provide him deniability. It is why IMO we have actually the strange spectacle that the president tweeting for lenient treatment of a former henchman. Generally henchmen get favored treatment without the leader having to speak a word. I think Henry II need to have had the same problem or 1) Beckett would not have actually defied that 2) he i will not ~ have had actually to ask because that Beckett to it is in terminated.

The Chronicle of the monarchs of England has one more version that Henry’s statement: "Will nobody of this lazy insignificant persons, whom ns maintain, supply me indigenous this rough priest?" sounds a lot prefer the self-pitying ton we often hear from Trump.

You simply can’t get good help in the swamp.


|Comments (View)

TweetEmail this post

Recent write-ups

The Last election Wasn’t Stolen

Does Bernie Sanders oppose Vaccine Mandates?

Fear chosen Trump and Biden

9/11, COVID-19, and also Civil Liberties

There was No far-ranging Change in the Number or intensity of Hurricanes Hitting the continental US between 1900 and also 2017!


Henry II, who is alleged to have said this shortly prior to the killing of cutting board Becket, have to have had actually a “resistance” faction in his court lot like the in the trump administration. Ordinarily an effective leaders don’t need to be explicit around what they want to happen; most of their employee spends many of that time trying to number out what the ceo wants and also doing the without being told. Giving the boss credible deniability has long to be grounds for promotion. This is true in corporations, charities, and also governments.

But lot of the ranking of the US federal government is left over from prior managements and wants to do the specific opposite of what the boss wants and also would choose to implicate him, not offer him deniability. That’s why IMO we have actually the strange spectacle that the chairman tweeting because that lenient treatment of a previous henchman. Generally henchmen acquire favored treatment without the leader having to to speak a word. Ns think Henry II should have had actually the same difficulty or 1) Beckett would not have actually defied the 2) he wouldn’t have had actually to ask because that Beckett to be terminated.

See more: Meaning Of Put The Horse Before The Cart Before The Horse'

The Chronicle that the majesties of England has another version the Henry’s statement: "Will no one of these lazy trivial persons, whom i maintain, supply me from this rough priest?" sound a lot like the self-pitying tone we often hear indigenous Trump.